Ms Phang Oy Cheng, KPMG’s Head of Sustainability Advisory in Malaysia, said, “While sustainability reporting has been largely voluntary over the past two decades, this year’s study reveal that regulation will make a difference in enabling companies to achieve solid progress in their ESG ambitions and sustainability reporting.
She added, “For example, while there has been marked improvements in companies reporting carbon reduction targets, plans remain vague, and actions are too slow to show real results. What’s needed more than ever is globally consistent standards from governments and a collective effort from the world’s major companies to report on all aspects of ESG, recognizing the clear links between the environment and wider social equality issues.”
The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) remains the most dominant standard used around the world. Singapore, Taiwan and Chile lead the uptake of this reporting standard. KPMG’s study also indicates a greater adoption of country stock exchange guidelines where GRI or Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) usage is lower. Leading adopters of stock exchange guidelines are South Africa (100%), Malaysia (95%) and India (89%).
Sustainability reporting through the ESG lens This year’s report highlighted some further challenges the G250 (world’s 250 largest companies by revenue based on the 2021 Fortune 500 ranking) are facing when reporting on ESG. Among the thousands of reports analyzed, less than half of the G250 provided reporting on ‘social’ components (e.g., modern slavery; diversity, inclusion and equity; community engagement; and labor issues), despite an increasing awareness of the link between the climate crisis and social inequality.
At the same time, less than half of companies disclosed their governance risks (e.g., corruption bribery and anti-corruption, anti-competitive behavior or political contributions.) On average, only one third of N100 companies have a dedicated member of their leadership team responsible for sustainability and less than one-quarter of these companies link sustainability to compensation among business leadership.
ESG disclosures continue to be overwhelmingly narrative-driven, rather than publishing quantitative or financial data regarding impacts. This is clearly an area of improvement for companies in Malaysia and around the world. On a positive note, around three-quarters of reporting companies conducted materiality assessments and are disclosing material topics.
A call to actionNew ESG requirements are driving a different perspective and set of conversations in Boardrooms, driving business leaders to stretch their thinking and ensure that from the top down they are making strategic decisions that take climate and broader ESG considerations more into account.
The KPMG report outlines the tangible ways businesses can invest in sustainability reporting:
— Understanding stakeholder expectations
— Incorporating materiality assessments into reporting
— Aligning reporting to mandatory or voluntary frameworks
— Investing in quality non-financial data management
— Understanding the impact of climate change and social issues on business
Phang concludes, “The pressure on businesses to report on non-financial metrics is only expected to grow as regulations evolve. We should start to see some progress over the coming year as organizations such as the International Sustainability Standards Board roll out new global standards for reporting. But companies shouldn’t wait to be told. By acting now, companies can make informed choices as a good corporate citizen to drive the positive change that their investors and customers demand.”
Download the KPMG Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2022 from
www.kpmg.com.my/ESGSOURCE: KPMG PLT
FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT:
Name: Kimberly Sammy
Manager, Marketing & Communications
KPMG in Malaysia
Tel: 012-3125373
Email: kimberlysammy@kpmg.com.my
Name: Aminfarhan Sazuki
Officer, Marketing & Communications
KPMG in Malaysia
Tel: 010-5947507
Email: aminfarhansazuki@kpmg.com.my
--BERNAMA